1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MissTica
3 years ago
5

Imperialism is:

History
2 answers:
wariber [46]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: A. seeking to expand influence and power by taking over other countries.

im·pe·ri·al·ism

/imˈpirēəˌlizəm/

Learn to pronounce

noun

a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.

"the struggle against imperialism"

Vilka [71]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is (A) Seeking to expand influence and power by taking over other countries.

You might be interested in
How is amendment 9 interpreted today?
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

The Ninth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. It says that all the rights not listed in the Constitution belong to the people, not the government.

or  in other words you could say, the rights of the people are not limited to just the rights listed in the Constitution.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Hamilton use the words "insurgent" and "insurrection" to describe the events in Pennsylvania
Nataly_w [17]

In the summer of 1794, tensions between farmers and creditors in western Pennsylvania boiled over into violence. A group of armed farmers, calling themselves the "Associators," began to attack and seize the property of anyone they saw as an enemy. In response, President George Washington dispatched a force of 13,000 militiamen to put down the rebellion.

In a report to Congress, Alexander Hamilton described the events in Pennsylvania as an "insurgent" and "insurrection." By using these words, Hamilton was trying to downplay the seriousness of the situation and avoid calling it a full-blown rebellion. He may have also been trying to avoid provoking even more violence by using language that was less inflammatory.

The situation in Pennsylvania was eventually resolved without any major bloodshed. However, the episode showed how quickly tensions could boil over into violence in the early days of the republic. It also showed the importance of having a strong central government that was able to quickly put down any internal threats to the stability of the country.

4 0
1 year ago
Discuss the benefits and problems of capitalism and s
Zigmanuir [339]

Capitalism is an economic system in which investments in an ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private  individuals or corporations specially as contrasted to cooperatively state-owned means of wealth. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

<h2>Why do people say that capitalism works better than socialism?</h2>

Capitalism and socialism have both been put to the test. Socialism never works; capitalism occasionally does. The outcomes are self-evident.

  • China. After the cultural revolution, the communist party seized power in China. They didn't have much financial success with anything. In its place, starvation claimed the lives of millions. Capitalist policies were put into place when Moa Zedong left office, and economic development suddenly skyrocketed.
  • US versus USSR The huge ideological conflict between capitalism and socialism was eventually the cause of the cold war. The sides began on land that was largely level. There is no doubt who won. The USA is currently the world's most powerful country by a wide margin. There is no longer a Soviet Union.
  • Almost all affluent countries, including the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, and even the Nordic countries, have capitalist systems. All have different amounts of social expenditure, but this is only sustained by the underlying capitalism.
  • Cuba. Cubans are all equal, yet they are all equally impoverished. Nearly everyone in Cuba has it better than even those who are regarded as impoverished in prosperous countries like the USA.
  • Venezuela. elected a communist administration. They are currently in financial ruin. It would be difficult to locate a socialist administration that has made any effort to better the lives of its citizens. Although I would think there are none at all, perhaps I haven't looked closely enough.

In conclusion, a basic misunderstanding of human nature is the basis of socialism. When everyone actually ends up doing is trying to piggyback off of everyone else's hard work, it makes the false assumption that everyone is willing to labor selflessly for the benefit of the group. Although it is not a flawless system, capitalism at least provides a reward for effort. And when it comes down to it, hard effort is what improves our lives.

<h2>What are the pros and cons of socialism and capitalism?</h2>

Capitalism:

Pros ⇒ It is a method of voluntary trade. It is the best at allocating scarce resources. It has given people the highest quality of life in human history. Property rights, arbitrary assessments, and free will are all protected. It best manages self-interest. It rewards people who make the world a better place by making them rich. Static economic classes are eliminated by capitalism's dynamic character. Of course, there is more.

Cons ⇒ There isn't a spokesperson for free market capitalism. Market manipulation, monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, fascism, inflation, central banking, fractional reserve banking, and any other financial news-related scheme are all confused with it.

Socialism:

Pro ⇒ Fair distribution of total generated wealth

Cons ⇒ It is oppressive. The loss of private property in the means of production prevents accurate economic calculations. Rare resources are squandered since there aren't genuine prices (actual prices reflect consumer values) (mountains of Soviet concrete). It does not satisfy the insatiable human drive for more (demand). denies possessing oneself. It establishes two static classes, one for workers and the other for politicians. Marx demanded that "undesirables" be removed from society (Irish, Scottish and non-whites).  

8 0
1 year ago
URGENT! NEED ANSWER NOW!
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

by getting out of the great depression and the growth of democracy and  communism

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
But he which bore my letter, friar john,was stay���d by accident, and yesternightreturn���d my letter back.based on these lines,
harkovskaia [24]
The correct answer for the given question above would be option D. Based on the given lines above, the role that Friar John played in the catastrophe is that, <span>he was prevented from delivering friar Laurence's letter, thus deciding to return it back. Hope this answer will help you. Thanks for posting your question.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Using your gtablel, explain why the murder of archduke ferdinand led to the outbreak of war
    10·1 answer
  • As a country becomes more secular its people
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the Continental Congress unable to provide the army with proper equipment?
    10·2 answers
  • What was lord Grenville's plane to enforce new taxes
    10·1 answer
  • What effect did Shays rebellion have toward the central government
    15·1 answer
  • Is it true Congress voted to go to war against the Allies.
    11·1 answer
  • Which case ruled against segregation at the District Court level? Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education Delgado v. Bast
    15·1 answer
  • What helps determine the bond amount or whether there is no bond?
    13·1 answer
  • From which city did paul revere begin his famous ride
    6·1 answer
  • Israel gained territory from egypt and syria in 1967 during the six day war. What was a major outcome of this action?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!