1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maksim [4K]
3 years ago
12

One scientific belief held by both René Descartes

History
2 answers:
11111nata11111 [884]3 years ago
6 0
Answer;
One scientific belief held by both Rene Descartes and Isaac Newton is that the reasoned thought is the way to discover truth. 

Explanation; 
Rene Descartes used deductive reasoning, deducing a conclusion from a set of premises, to determine the nature of the universe, that was contrary to other great thinkers of the time who used scientific observation.
Sir Isaac Newton; specialized in uniting experimental and theoretical elements of modern science. 
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
6 0
One scientific belief held by both René Descartes and Isaac Newton is that "<span>(1) reasoned thought is the way to discover truth," since both of these men were progressive thinkers who challenged the religious status quo. </span>
You might be interested in
If you were to read an excerpt from a journal written by a woman during the
Annette [7]
In my own opinion I believe the answer is B, due to the fact that you can see what she had went through, through her writing.
5 0
3 years ago
True or False: The Reformation lessened persecution of the Jews in<br> Europe
nikdorinn [45]

the answer would be true

4 0
3 years ago
How did the United States feel about the Soviet Union's contributions to the Space Race?
guajiro [1.7K]
The answer is definitely C.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
How did Horace Mann contribute to the reform in education? (1 point)
il63 [147K]

Answer:

its uh a or d i have butt inching

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is not true about Texas in the 1920-
    12·1 answer
  • What year was oil discovered in Texas?
    15·2 answers
  • The fourteen points of the early 20th century
    6·2 answers
  • Why did nathaniel bacon lead a rebellion against the wealthy land owners of virginia?
    15·1 answer
  • What aspect of the Modernist period inspired writers and artists to break from traditional forms?
    11·1 answer
  • He was a one-term president at this time.
    6·1 answer
  • Photosynthesis moves carbon atoms from the atmosphere to the biosphere
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Political, social and cultural changes in the early Roman empire
    9·1 answer
  • "para sa susunod na pangulo"​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!