1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nordsb [41]
3 years ago
8

In what ways did the Native Americans resist the Indian Removal Act?

History
1 answer:
erastovalidia [21]3 years ago
3 0

There were two ways in which Native Americans resisted the Indian Removal Act of 1830: By fighting against U.S. Army and getting John Marshall support in trying to deal with the U.S. court system.

The Second Seminole War, which took place in Florida from 1835 to 1842, was the most important event regarding resistance of the Indian Removal Act. Several lifes were lost, including 3,000 Native Americans and 1,600 U.S military. After one year since the war ended, over 3,800 Seminoles were compelled to abandon their homes and move to Indian territories that now belong to Oklahoma.

In regards with the efforts to deal with the U.S court system, the most important case took place in 1832 (the case of Worcester v. Georgia), in which a group of white preachers who settled in territory of the Cherokee Nation dared a Georgia law that established it was forbidden for them to live there. Addressing the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Marshall claimed that in the words of U.S Constitution, Cherokees were seen as equal as any other nation, and the relationship between the two countries must be the same. Thus, he ruled that these lands belonged only to Native American tribes and U.S government was not allowed to intervene in any way. Jackson ignored this ruling and continued with the removal of Native Americans in these territories, an event known as the "Trial of Tears".

You might be interested in
The British turned to taxing the American colonies because
aleksklad [387]
Because of the French and Indian war. Taxes were the only way to pay for that war. The British thought that the Americans had to pay some of the tax for protection. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On September 28, 1836, the Cherokee leader Chief John Ross wrote a letter of protest to the Senate and House of Representatives.
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

The letter of protest written at Red Clay Council Ground from Chief John Ross of the Cherokee Nation (September 28, 1836)  

To the Senate and House of Representatives:

It is well known that for a number of years past we have been harassed by a series of vexations, which it is deemed unnecessary to recite in detail, but the evidence of which our delegation will be prepared to furnish. With a view to bringing our troubles to a close, a delegation was appointed on the 23rd of October, 1835, by the General Council of the nation, clothed with full powers to enter into arrangements with the Government of the United States, for the final adjustment of all our existing difficulties. The delegation failing to effect an arrangement with the United States commissioner, then in the nation, proceeded, agreeably to their instructions in that case, to Washington City, for the purpose of negotiating a treaty with the authorities of the United States.  

After the departure of the Delegation, a contract was made by the Rev. John F. Schermerhorn, and certain individual Cherokees, purporting to be a "treaty, concluded at New Echota, in the State of Georgia, on the 29th day of  December, 1835, by General William Carroll and John F. Schermerhorn, commissioners on the part of the United States, and the chiefs, headmen, and people of the Cherokee tribes of Indians." A spurious Delegation, in violation of a special injunction of the general council of the nation, proceeded to Washington City with this pretended treaty, and by false and fraudulent representations supplanted in the favor of the Government the legal and accredited Delegation of the Cherokee people, and obtained for this instrument, after making important alterations in its provisions, the recognition of the United States Government. And now it is presented to us as a treaty, ratified by the Senate, and approved by the President [Andrew Jackson], and our acquiescence in its requirements demanded, under the sanction of the displeasure of the United States, and the threat of summary compulsion, in case of refusal. It comes to us, not through our legitimate authorities, the known and usual medium of communication between the Government of the United States and our nation, but through the agency of a complication of powers, civil and military.  

By the stipulations of this instrument, we are despoiled of our private possessions, the indefeasible property of individuals. We are stripped of every attribute of freedom and eligibility for legal self-defence. Our property may be plundered before our eyes; violence may be committed on our persons; even our lives may be taken away, and there is none to regard our complaints. We are denationalized; we are disfranchised. We are deprived of membership in the human family! We have neither land nor home, nor resting place that can be called our own. And this is effected by the provisions of a compact which assumes the venerated, the sacred appellation of treaty.  

We are overwhelmed! Our hearts are sickened, our utterance is paralized, when we reflect on the condition in which we are placed, by the audacious practices of unprincipled men, who have managed their stratagems with so much dexterity as to impose on the Government of the United States, in the face of our earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Where did Ferdinand Magellan die?
Karolina [17]
April 27, 1521, <span>Mactan, Philippines</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think mr frank chose to publish annes diary after war?
NARA [144]
To share what his family been through
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Desperate, Will Mark Brainllest and Give Thanks for Correct Answer
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer: More than 400,000 African Americans served in the United States armed forces during World War I, and about half of those saw duty in France.

Explanation: Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which exploration did king Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain sponsor?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these is an apt description of the Scots-Irish?
    15·1 answer
  • The diagram below shows military innovations that affected the way World War I was fought: Image of a concept web with a central
    14·2 answers
  • What major cities are important to the islamic faith
    8·1 answer
  • What geographic factor has benefited trade in Africa and the middle east ​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these was a direct result of the Punic Wars?
    13·1 answer
  • Economists blamed all of the following for causing the depression except
    15·1 answer
  • What benefits did these clauses give the allies (war guilt clauses)
    15·1 answer
  • "I think that people can't be trusted. They need to be controlled in order for society to work well." This statement expresses t
    12·1 answer
  • What were the 2 other main foods eaten by the Aztec's?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!