Answer:
As an undergraduate studying psychology, my intended major is crime investigation.
I started having interest in this field since the day my uncle's was convicted for a crime he did not commit, just because he pleaded guilty due to the pains that was inflicted on him to do so and be free in jail. I felt this should not be a proper way to investigate crime. That is why I was motivated to major in this field, so as to bring the change needed in the field.
Sometimes I practice this investigation, using my younger siblings. It has helped me to understand that empathy is still important in crime investigation, even though it sometimes makes us feel biased. I have become the only one my parents rely on, to determine who among my siblings that has committed an offence during dispute.
Answer:
Very interesting kindly for more 0743903327
Answer:
Ex post facto
Explanation:
Ex post facto may be considered a form of research pattern whereby the facts are already established beforehand. That is findings about a particular phenomenon or occurence begins only after the facts about the incident or phenomenon has been established. It is also called after the fact research whereby the researcher only delves into finding patterned after the facts have been established without the knowledge, understanding of the researcher. Ex post facto is used to understand the pattern or effect rather than if the fact or problems truly exists.
Answer:
debunking
Explanation:
Debunking: In sociology, the term debunking was proposed by Peter Berger during 1963, and is referred to as the propensity of socio-logical consciousness.
Debunking represents the phenomenon that explains the sociological perspective in a way that it never takes a specific social world based on face value, in the absence of assuming the sociological perspective as it appears to be. Along with this, it offers judgment and nuances.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the process of debunking.
