Answer: True. Indirect Denial method should be considered before direct method.
Explanation: The indirect denial method of dealing with a customer is a method in which the customer is first agreed with when expressing a wrong objection. In this method, the customer's argument is first held to be valid, and this is done in order to create a level of trust or confidence with the customer.
After rapport has been established, evidence can then be brought to dispute the customer's claims.
By using the method, the customer doesn't feel threatened or alarmed from the onset and a heated argument will be avoided.
Direct denial method is the opposite of indirect denial method, in this case, strong arguments are used to oppose a customer's claims to show that they have made a mistake.
Answer:
$60,000
Explanation:
Under accrual basis of accounting,
Revenues are recorded when it's earned, it does not base on when it is collected.
So the Revenues for 2016 should be $250,000 alone.
Similarly, expenses are recorded when it is incurred rather than when it is paid.
So the Expenses for 2016 should only be $190,000
As a result, the <u>Net Income is $60,000</u> ($250,000 - $190,000)
Based on the fact that Medtronic which produces heart pacemakers makes a new product and the convention presentations are an example of its
- market segmentation and targeting strategy.
<h3>What is Market Segmentation?</h3>
This refers to the division of target markets into different approachable groups based on demographics and other factors.
With this in mind, we can see that because Medtronic expanded its market to Asia, to show the many beneficial features of their new product, this shows their market segmentation and targeting strategy.
Read more about market segmentation here:
brainly.com/question/5545577
Answer:
0.004%
Explanation:
The desired ROI per paid of shoes can be calculated using the following formula:
ROI per pair of shoes = ROI / Number of units sold
By putting values we have:
ROI per pair of shoes = 20% / 5000 pairs = 0.004%
This is the return that every shoe pair must achieve to achieve 20% ROI on aggregating.
Answer:
Eddith Carolina could accept to take on the new cosmetic line, while Michael Sanders may reject same.
Explanation:
Eddith Carolina, been the president of the company, has shown that he's a risk taker. The idea behind this is that he is open to new opportunities that could otherwise improve his holdings and networth. The decision to take on a new cosmetic line is therefore in line with the policy of the President of the company. The implication is that Eddith Carolina is tilted to accepting the proposal.
Michael Sanders, on the other hand, is an ordinary employee. Even though he is the manager of the division, he bears no risk of ownership. And in an event of liquidation or solvency, he simply has no big collateral to part with, unlike the Eddith Carolinas. What individual like Michael Sanders are interested in is the protection of their job and income. Knowing the nature of an employee as conservative and risk averse and the fear of not loosing their paid job, it is therefore not surprising that Michael Sanders could reject the new cosmetic line bid.
