I'm not sure if you mean Guildenstern, but <span>When </span>Hamlet<span> kills Polonius, Claudius recruits Rosencrantz and</span>Guildenstern<span> to escort </span>Hamlet<span> to England, providing them with a letter for the King of England instructing him to have </span>Hamlet <span>killed.</span>
To try to analyze what kind of insect becomes Gregor it is necessary to highlight, in The Metamorphosis does not say that it is an insect, bug, beetle or cockroach.
The story is not clear in the species but specific in its associations: it is always a kind of small and multiple paw, of an expansive, insatiable and promiscuous nature, a being so repulsive that it produces chills just by being mentioned.
Kafka never explains it.
One of the broadest interpretations points to Gregorio Samsa becoming a cockroach. However, a closer analysis indicates that we are facing another type of creature.
Nabokov analyzed the clues given by Kafka to draw his conclusions about the shape and size of the insect. And he comes to determine that it looks like a cockroach in only one aspect: its color is brown.
For Nabokov, there are other evident proofs to think that it is actually a beetle: the "strong jaws" of Gregory, the "huge convex belly divided into segments" or his "hard round back" are some examples.
According to some sources, it seems indisputable that Kafka intentionally chooses the words so as not to make clear what kind of insect Gregorio Samsa is,
Nabokov stating book sentences: "Gregorio the beetle never realizes that it has wings under the hard covering of its back". That is to say, that the actor of the most anguished story in universal literature is really a creature that can fly and escape from the place without knowing it like so many of us.
Answer: the last one!
Explanation:
when using a semi colon you can only use it when both sentences on each side of the semi colon are independent. (meaning they can be there own COMPLETE sentences, they have to make sense!) hope this helped!
The correct answer should be <span>d. manus : hand
That is because the analogy fits since the first words represent the second word in latin. </span>
The conclusion that can be made about the narrator of this reading is that <u>he is embarrassed about introducing his friends to his family, who are different than his friends.</u>
<u />
According to the reading, the narrator talks about the meeting between his friends and members of his family, where he was uncomfortable about his relation with his family in front of his friends.
He tried his best to hide his embarrassment and take his friends away from the scene as quickly as possible.
Therefore, the conclusion that can be made about the narrator is option A
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/13082522
