Answer:
Explanation:
The poem was written in 1827, the same year Poe dropped out of school and had his first poems printed. This poem is about Poe following his passion and realizing that it will not be easy. This poem reflects Poe's realization that the road he has chosen will not be an easy or comfortable one.
Hope that helps! :)
Yes, Krakauer has an acceptable background to speak with
authority on this subject.
Krakauer has an acceptable background to speak on the
subject because he has scores of outdoor experience; throughout the book, he makes
mention of his climbing adventures throughout the book. In fact, written a
number of books and articles about his outdoor experiences (e.g. Into Thin Air).
Other than that, he knows quite a number of outdoor experts. Furthermore, Krakauer
seems to understand Chris McCandless because of his own experiences with his
father.
It's C- organizing the information is the next step.
If this went chronologically she would make an outline and draft after this step.
Option C. It contains all the sources you cite in your article, which appear in alphabetical order by author name.
According to MLA, all the works cited in your article are listed in a separate page, which is at the ende of the article and starts with the title Works cited. The list is ordered alphabetically by last name of author.
Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
