Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
<span>because that's where writer,artists, philosophes, and others exchanged ideas</span>
Answer:
D. Every time you fail to donate, another child misses a meal.
Explanation:
There are three central rhetorical approaches: pathos, logos, and ethos. Pathos is an appeal to emotion; logos, to logic; ethos, to credibility.
D is the best example of pathos because it doesn't use logic (like B, which cites a statistic) or credibility (like A, which claims that dentists, a respectable source, recommend brushing). It uses an emotional appeal in claiming that lack of donations is linked to child hunger. All of these can be very persuasive; it's important to know your audience!
Cash money would lose integrity if no gold was there to represent and backup our currency value.
To settle America and make a new and better place and break away from the harsh British government.
They were more free in spirit.
