Answer:
D. Societies that exhibit mechanical solidarity have a simpler division of labor and a group conscience. Societies that exhibit organic solidarity have complex divisions of labor and increased individualism.
Explanation:
The classification of society into the Mechanical and Organic was done by a Sociologist named Emile Durkheim. From his classification of society, the Mechanical type of society is a society that relies on the sameness or homogeneity of people. He reasoned that in this type of society, people have similar interests, in terms of religion, way of life and education. They had a simple division of labor and a group or collective conscience. This kind of society can be found in rural settings.
The society that exhibits Organic solidarity, however, relies on the interdependence of people and what they do. This society exists on the basis that people rely on each other to survive. For, example we all rely on the services of teachers, doctors, and other professions. This society is found in urban or more advanced settings. There is a complex division of labor and increased individualism in this society.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The production of an item is not going through the consumers, but instead through the producers. The consumers are the ones that buy the products, while the producers are the ones that produce the products. In order to know how much should they produce, the producers rely on the market demand schedules. Through them, the producers are aware of how much is demanded, so that they can produce the right amount, and not come in a situation to have less products on the market, or too much products on the market.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
Money
Explanation:
Why not uh mean its it kinda obvious.
Intense mood swings known as major depression and mania.
