<span>In January 1830, in a dramatic encounter on the floor of the United States Senate, the debate over the nature of the Union took an alarming turn. The debate moved beyond the exchange of alternative views on how to administer the federal government to accusations and recriminations about the destruction of the federal government and the Union. States’ rights and nationalist positions, which previously were adopted without regard to a consistent pattern of sectional identification or alignment, were defined in a way that portended political violence between irreconcilably opposed sections. The event that presented this portent of sectional discord was the debate over the nature of the Union between Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina.</span>
Answer:
Investigation
Arrest
Trial
Jury deliberation
Verdict
Sentencing
Indictment
Appeal
Explanation:
I believe this is right but let me know if I'm wrong.
The reapportionment as required by the Warren Court shifted more political power to the African-Americans.
<h3>What is a Reapportionment?</h3>
It refers to the altering of the states' seats in the U.S. Congress according to changes in the census and redistricting re-draw of the political power.
Hence, the reapportionment as required by the Warren Court shifted more political power to the African-Americans.
Read more about reapportionment
<em>brainly.com/question/2812849</em>
#SPJ12
Answer:
it depends
Explanation:
Its hard to get a job for some people and part of are population lives in poverty but we also have complete freedom to do whatever we want with a few exceptions of are laws
Answer: B. embed the chart (I just took the test)
Explanation:
