Hey I have read this a while ago so unfortunately I cannot give you detailed textual evidences. However I can give you some original written ideas.
Basically Brutus uses pure logic in his speech in order to modify his act of murdering his friend. He does take blame and also proves his nobility by saying (or repeating) that he loved Caesar. His speech concludes to Brutus not having sufficient impact on his listeners (at least less than that of Antony). Brutus can indeed be classified as a noble man, as he leaves the place and allows Antony to have his regards paid towards Julius Caesar.
Antony however makes use of numerous emotional gestures, along with expressions in order to awaken the attention of wrong done towards Caesar. He initiates his speech with saying that he can barely talk due to his grief. He further supports his arguments by saying that Caesar was innocent and a noble and well mannered man as well.
Answer:
I use twitter the most. My screen time for it is 8 hours and it's only 9:30 am
Explanation:
:/
<span>The correct answer is A. the results of a scientific study would be the most effective evidence. Thoughts and opinions are not valid for scientific studies because they are based on emotions and personal values. Ethics also have a problematic effect on science because values and morals are often different from society to society.</span>
Your answer would be, The Play wright that introduce dialogue to the stage by conversing with chorus was THESPIS.
Hope that helps!!!! Answer: THESPIS
Answer: The writer compare and contrast how the theme are developed
Explanation:
