Answer:panish-American War, (1898), conflict between the United States and Spain that ended Spanish colonial rule in the Americas and resulted in U.S. acquisition of territories in the western Pacific and Latin America.
Explanation:
Yes, they were ennimies in the war.
I would know about John Marshall. He was a federalist supreme court chief justice. He gave more power to the government by taking a loose construction of the Constitution. So basically he said, "If it doesnt say we (Fed Gov't) cant do it, then we can)".
<span>Know about these Court cases </span>
<span>Gibbons V. Ogden </span>
<span>McCullough V. Maryland </span>
<span>Fletcher V. Peck </span>
<span>Cohens V. Virginia </span>
<span>Barron V. Baltimore- this one is hard to find, so basically it just said that because the Bill of Rights was a Federal decision, it didnt apply to the states. </span>
<span>The rest are really easy to find out about, and you could type in John Marshall and it would probably give you all of these. </span>
<span>http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/marshall.html </span>
<span>http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html- heres gibbons/ogden</span>
Answer:
Sectionalism worried some of the major Americans too much as and when they were slowly moving close towards the civil war.
Explanation:
Sectionalism refers to obtain a distinction between the two sect of the territory. Referring to the Americans, sectionalism came into being, with the dividend of North America and South America.
The feel which bring about sectionalism among the citizen of the nation is that when they develop loyalty about a part of the nation but not towards the entire nation.
Sectionalism developed among the North Americans or simply Northerners based on slavery, as they were opposing slavery, whereas Southerners were instituting slavery.