Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, an Incan would have described this achievement as “clever” because he/she wouldn't have thought that such limited land would produce so many corns. The fact that only a small portion of the land could grow corns was hampering the food supply of the Incan people.
When irrigation channels were constructed on the demands of the king, land became more fertile and the production of corns increased rapidly. This was truly a clever achievement for the Incas who had limited fertile land to grow corns.
Slavery was a hotly debated topic at the Constitutional Convention. On one hand, Southern states wanted slaves to count towards population. This would increase the amount of representatives the Southern states had in the House of Representatives.
On the other hand, the South did not want slaves to count towards the population because this would result in the Southern states paying more direct taxes to the federal government.
The North felt the opposite than the South. Nonetheless, this issue was solved by the 3/5ths Compromise. This compromise stated that every 5 slaves would count as 3 people towards a states population for both representation and taxation.
Answer:
C) Samuel Adams would be your answer
Explanation:
Samuel Adams was a Boston-born political leader who played a vital role in moving colonial America to its decisive break with Britain during the American Revolution. The second cousin of President John Adams, Sam Adams helped organize opposition to British taxation, including the Boston Tea Party. In his home state of Massachusetts, Adams held a number of political offices, and served as governor from 1793 to 1797.
The Calender is based on the farming seasons, however, the Egyptians noticed that they need a few more days to fit the seasons, So the calendar is important Egyptian achievement because they added five days, holidays to thank gods, and they invented 365-day calendar.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "a. the New York Times." The Times appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court. The Court ruled against Sullivan and in favor of the New York Times."<span>
</span>
