Answer:
$20,670
Explanation:
Firm A Firm B
Actual Dumping 157 183
Pollution Permits Allotted <u> 11 </u> <u> 11 </u>
Reduction Required 146 172
Cost of Dumping 1 ton $160 $65
As the cost of dumping to Firm A is $160 which is higher than the marginal cost of dumping of Firm B which is $65, so it is better that Firm B take benefit from it by selling it at $65. So now total tons require dumping is 318 tons (146 + 172).
Total cost of reducing pollution = 318 tons * $65 = $20,670
Answer:
<h2>The answer,in this case would be option C) in the answer choices given or Advisory Board.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this case,Shelly is basically seeking professional or experienced guidance or advice on her decision to launch a social network system or program for chefs pertaining to her business.
- An advisory board can be characterized as a formal or official board consisting of various professional,expert and experienced officials or entities who can provide important advises,feedback or suggestions on any business related decision making process.
- Hence, in this case Shelly is opting to form an advisory prior to final implementation of her proposed idea or policy.
D is the answer
Hey say thanks!
I guess you have loss in the given situation even if your company doesn’t have AFC
Answer: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act increases the penalties for corporate wrongdoing. (A)
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed to reduce corporate fraud. The Act led to the creation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board which was in charge of overseeing the accounting industry. Protection was given to whistleblowers and giving company loans to executives was banned. Chief executive officers were also held responsible for errors made in accounting audits.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was as a result of financial scandals involving publicly traded firms such as WorldCom, Tyco International Plc and Enron Corporation in 2000. The frauds in the companies affected the confidence of investors which eventually led to the Act.