Answer:
Transformation that changes the size of a figure, but not the shape.
Step-by-step explanation:
-2.5>-3 because the bigger a negative number is like -15,-18, etc the smaller it’s value actually gets so -2.5 is greater because it is closer to 0 on a number line.
Answer:
Yeah with that type of problem
Step-by-step explanation:
You aint getting answered for the next 4 hours <3
You can solve this problem and calculate the height of the pole, by following the steps below:
Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg
α is the angle of elevation (α=<span>67°).
</span> The opposite leg is <span>the height of the pole. Let's call it "x".
</span> Adjacent leg=137 feet
When you substitute these values into the formula Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg, you have:
Tan(α)=Opposite leg/Adjacent leg
Tan(67°)=x/137
You must clear the "x"
x=137xTan(67°)
x=322.75
W<span>hat is the height of the pole?</span>
The answer is: The height of the pole is 322.75 feet.
