Answer:
Initially, white colonists viewed Native Americans as helpful and friendly. They welcomed the Natives into their settlements, and the colonists willingly engaged in trade with them. ... Their refusal to conform to European culture angered the colonists and hostilities soon broke out between the two groups.
They would be the so-called contactless cards, because they don't require you to have any intervention and they automatically contact your credit card provider.
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
I have no idea if this helps:
Explanation:
Huey Long how to plan or propaganda if you will who's called the share our wealth plan and it shows that you believed in communism in a way because it means that like everyone is going to share their money . and if someone Works 10 hours a day could get $300 a week and someone else who works 6 hours a day can get the same amount of money for lost work meeting everyone is the same and you can't earn anything because everyone's equal . I think a lot of people think the idea of like communism in the world being equal and like the fact you don't need to earn anything and you can still be the same as another person can be really appealing and if he had this image that perceived him as someone who believed in equality but just didn't really he just wanted to rule
everything we can buy.like love affection, care,etc.we must be positive. reduce slavery as well asother negative impact
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
