When a tactics is harmful causing various harms to human health or posing threat it should not be supported.
<h3>What are Harmful tactics?</h3>
They are some actions that are taken a particular time to achieve a particular goal and objective which is short time.
This actions are harmful and the results are usually detrimental.
Therefore, U.S. government should not support U.S. tobacco company interest abroad if they are using harmful tactics.
Learn more on harmful tactics
brainly.com/question/24898245
Two exceptions to the special passive activity rule for real estate activities provide the whole or partial offset of real estate rental losses against active or portfolio income, even when the business is otherwise regarded as a passive activity.
<h3>Which rules regarding passive activities for rental revenue are exceptions?</h3>
- You have a stake in the yearly commerce or economic activities.
- During the current tax year or at least 2 of the 5 tax years prior, the rental property was utilized primarily in that trade or company.
<h3>Only real estate is subject to passive loss restrictions, right?</h3>
Generally speaking, the following actions can result in passive losses (and income): leasing of equipment. Rental property (though there are some exceptions) a farm or a sole proprietorship in which the taxpayer has no substantial interest.
<h3>How can passive income be balanced?</h3>
Selling off your rental properties will help you make up for your passive losses. You don't actually have to sell the property that's causing the losses to balance them effectively. Any passive income will be offset by losses.
Learn more about special passive activity rule: brainly.com/question/28137310
#SPJ4
True.
The Principle of Utility says actions are <u>right </u>when they promote happiness or pleasure, and wrong when they cause unhappiness or pain. So in order to figure out if something is right or wrong you will first have to know if it promotes happiness.
Answer:
a. Karen Meyer's personal records
c. American red cross
Explanation:
The $6,000 contribution should be recorded in Karen Meyer's personal records because 1) the donation was made on her personal name 2) a donation of such size is relevant when Karen files her taxes.
The contribution should also be recorded in the American red cross records because the organization needs to clarify to the tax authorities where each sum of money it obtains comes from.
