They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
Answer: There was a drought which made farming very dry so the plants and vegetation didnt get enough water to grow
Explanation:
Ummmm....what's this for???
Hitler approved the contract so he could overrun Poland without Russia fighting after.
In short, it allowed him to invade Poland without Soviet interference.
Good luck :)