Answer: $298,800
Explanation:
Cost of goods purchased = Gross merchandise cost + Transportation-in (Carriage inwards) - Purchase discount - Purchase returns
= 304,000 + 6,700 - 3,500 - 8,400
= $298,800
Answer:
Please refer to the below;
Explanation:
Difference between Floor inspection and Functional inspection.
• Floor inspection is usually conducted in a production environment. It involves checking of materials while processing in the machine by inspectors. Rather than checking the materials in the machine at the beginning of production, floor inspection checks the materials while in process inorder to ensure that the defected ones are quickly detected and expunged. It also ensure that the equipments used in processing are properly functioning.
• Functional inspection is an inspection that checks the overall function of a product rather than what makes up the component parts. For instance the load capacity and speed of a vehicle can be checked for optimal performance whereas individual parts that make up the vehicle are not checked, yet bring out satisfactory performance when combined together. This form of inspection is concerned with verification of final output and does not provide details about different sections instead provides a wider understanding of comfort that emanate from inspecting same item.
Points of Convergence between Floor inspection and Functional inspection.
• The key objective of both floor and functional inspection is quality output having reviewed and examined their expectations.
• Both floor and functional inspection work to prevent defective product from flowing down the successive operations and avoid loss to the company
• Both floor and functional inspection aim at meeting customers requirements, wants and needs.
Answer:
present value = $500,000/1.08 + $515,000/1.08² + $600,000/1.08³ = $1,380,791.80
you calculated the present value correctly, assuming that you receive the annual payments at the end of each year (ordinary annuity).
but if you receive the annual payment at the beginning of the year (annuity due) = $500,000 + $515,000/1.08 + $600,000/1.08² = $1,493,255
it's not exactly the same value, but it is much closer and you could assume that the difference is due to rounding: ($1,493,255 - $1,495,370) / $1,495,370 = -0.1%
Answer: a) 1
b) yes marginal rate of substitution is less than the relative price
c) 2.00
Explanation:
a) Raul’s marginal rate of substitution is 1 because he is only willing to trade 1 cal card for 1 additional Nolan card
b) Raul’s marginal rate of substitution is Mc/Mn = 1 However, the relative price of a Cal Ripken card is Pc/Pn = $24/$12 = 2.00. Since the marginal rate of substitution is less than the relative price, Raul can make himself better off by selling 1 Cal card and buying Nolan cards.
c) His marginal rate of substitution must be equal to the relative price; the relative price rule holds that says that Mc/Mn = Pc/Pn. From b above we know that the relative price is 2.00, Raul's marginal rate of substitution must also be 2.00.
