Answer:
The answer is: Buyers will bid the asset's price down until it equals the present value of income.
Explanation:
As the current asset price is greater than the present value of income, it is overpriced.
So, seller is much willing to sell at this price, however, buyers does not want to buy asset at this price as they only want to purchase it at the price equals to the present value of its income.
So, Buyers will bid the asset's price down until it equals the present value of income which is the level they are willing to buy and also at which the seller is willing to sell also.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, it can be said that yes the attorney's actions are proper because the referral fee was reasonable. A standard referral fee percentage could be around 10% for a closed job, starting at around 2-5% for e-mail introductions and even up to 15-20% for referrals where the referrer deals alone with the client. As long as the referral fee is reasonable and the attorney is not taking advantage then his/her actions are proper and ethical.
Answer:
-$1,562.50
Explanation:
Calculation to determine The highest net profit possible for the speculator based
Premium of the option = $.05 per unit * (31,250 units)
Premium of the option= -$1,562.50
Therefore Based on the information given and the above calculation The HIGHEST NET PROFIT that will be possible for the speculator will be -$1,562.50
Answer:
Contribution margin = $16
Explanation:
Contribution is the difference between the selling price and the variable cost.
Contribution margin = (Sales - variable cost )
Variable cost = Variable manufacturing + Variable selling cost
Variable cost = 18 + (15%× 40) = 24
Contribution margin = 40 - 24 = $16
Contribution margin = $16
Answer:
True
Explanation:
For a stock to be in equilibrium, two conditions are necessary:
(1) The stock's market price must equal its intrinsic value as seen by the marginal investor;
(2) the expected return as seen by the marginal investor must equal his or her required return.
