Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
"At the same time, circuits involved in stress become increasingly sensitive, leading to increased displeasure and negative moods when not taking the drug, which are signs of withdrawal. These combined effects make the user more likely to focus on seeking the drug instead of relationships, food, or other natural rewards." I got it from this wedsite just in case you need more info about it. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/cocaine/what-are-long-term-effects-cocaine-u...
Answer:
because a narrator that doesn't seems to be telling the truth or seems unusual
Answer:D respectful acceptance
Explanation: Took the quiz
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer would be resilient
Explanation:
Risilient means to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions.
