A student completes an assignment for class where he talks about why his school should change certain rules. His teacher says the essay is excellent and posts it on the school’s website on a page for great student work. The principal orders the teacher to remove the essay from the website. The student feels that the principal violated his rights. Which of the following is likely to happen if the student takes his case to court?
The court will find in favor of the principal based on Tinker v. Des Moines. The student does not have the right to exercise free speech in his classes or assignments.
The court will find in favor of the principal based on Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.
<u>The principal has the right to censor material published on the school-owned website. </u>
The court will find in favor of the student based on Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.
The student has a right to freedom of expression in online assignments.
The court will find in favor of the student based on Tinker v. Des Moines.
The student has a right to freedom of speech in school.
I think the answer is A hope this helps
I am pretty sure it is to serve as an elevator by raising and lowering ships. But i might be wrong. I know it is not the last one
Answer:
a;Rulers should rule nicely, subjects be loyal
Respect elders
b;Desire nothing, and there will be peace
Become with nature
Be selfless
c;Punish people who dont do well
Dont criticize what the government does
Control ideas
2.) all founded by specific people, all emerged during warring states period
3.) all benefit different people e.g, legalism is good for government officials/rulers, daoism is good for selfless, non greedy people, and confucianism benefits almost everyone. also, confucianism was more having good morals, while daosim is more go with the flow, and legalism was being punished for doing bad things
Explanation: