Answer:
He created a strong navy, reorganized his army according to Western standards, secularized schools, administered greater control over the reactionary Orthodox Church and introduced new administrative and territorial divisions of the country.
Explanation:
In the United States, there was a domino effect boom - we were primarily agrarian and when the military was demobilized there was a baby boom and many of the returning troops moved to cities and created an economic boom- they had just seen the great big world - they weren't going back to the farm and the small lives they lived before. Europe was in need of a great many manufactured goods and we supplied a good portion of it and the US celebrated with new music, dance, fashion, ideals, and art - culturally America blossomed - a post war renaissance of sorts and to the victor goes the spoils attitude as artists, designers, musicians, composers, playwrights
In Europe, including Russia, there was chaos. The great Empires and Royal Lines of Rulers were gone: Russian, Austrio-Hungarian, German, Tsars, Emperors, Kaisers - ALL GONE. The Versailles treaty beggared and humiliated Germany. In Europe, manufacturing and agriculture were in a shambles and governments and industry were trying to figure out what to do and how to do it and did they have any authority anymore. Unemployment skyrocketed and discontent swelled and defeated countries licked their wounds and hardened their outlooks preparing for a future rematch. Russia became 4 socialist republics and morphed into the Soviet Union and with a reign of Terror the modern world had never seen before the USSR began it's methodical deliberate soul crushing brutalities on the people of the new Soviet Union - 4 soviets to start eventually expanding into 15 soviets, 16 if you count the Vory y zakone. The USSR had big construction plans even though they were overwhelmingly agrarian but the communists had stolen/liberated/accessed (pick whichever term speaks to you) unimaginable stores of vast wealth in natural resources - platinum and diamond mines not to mention timber cotton wheat coal oil and on an on. So, the Russian empire gone and the white army a fastly fading memory, the Red Army took control of all the military and because they had a new country to run, they didn't really demobilize in the way that the United States did - WWI was the war to end all wars and there was no reason to keep or train an army for future wars because there would never again be one. Simple. Wrong of course - less than 20 years later we would know that only the dead have seen an end to war - think it was George Santayana who wrote it in his Tipperary soliloquy but everybody else wants to say Plato - either way we learned the lesson - our American military demobilization was the last time the American people would ever be so naive regarding war. Maniacal madmen are a fact of life and we will stand an Army of Orwellian Rough Men at all times (the allusion I am making is to the quote by essayist Richard Grenier who wrote in 1993: "As George Orwell pointed out, people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.")
Answer:
King adopted a retorical strategy commonly called <em><u>an appeal to emotion</u></em>. This is because, he was trying to appeal to the emotions of other blacks living in America of the need to act now to end the segregation rather than accepting it and feeling defeated.
This retorics is captured in this quote below:
"<em> ...... when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six-year-old daughter why she can't go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears welling up in her little eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children......</em>"
Explanation:
Esta pregunta está incompleta. A continuación, la pregunta completa:
Leer:
Historia del siglo XX chileno. Balance paradojal (Correa, S. 2001) y Democracia en Chile. Lecciones para la gobernabilidad (Boeninger, E. 1998)
¿Cual es punto de discrepancia entre Correa y otros con Boeninger sobre las causas de la crisis del sistema parlamentario?
Answer:
Correa y Boeninger discrepan en quienes causaron la crisis parlamentaria, los mlitares o los parlamentarios.
Explanation:
Correa adjudica responsabilidad a los mismos parlamentarios, cuya puja entre el Alessandrismo y la oposición, sumada a la priorización de los debates sobre sus propios sueldos antes de los reajustes salariales para empleados públicos y militares, llevó a la crisis parlamentaria que culminó en el golpe militar de 1925.
Por otro lado, Boeninger destaca el rol de los militares en la crisis del sistema parlamentario, estableciendo que, ante la crisis político social, el ejército asumió la representación de los intereses de la clase media a través del golpe que restablecería a Alessandri como presidente.
Answer: a central government is national government from a single important city rather than local government.
Explanation: its purpose is to oversees finance, commerce, national defense, foreign affairs, and all laws 'necessary and proper'.
