Answer:
The answer is - To serve as an outgroup
Explanation:
The options are;
a) to see if the lily and the orchids show all the same shared derived characters (synapomorphies)
b) to demonstrate likely homoplasies
c) to see if the lily is a cryptic orchid species
d) to serve as an outgroup
The answer is D- To serve as an Outgroup
A phylogenetic tree is also called an evolutionary tree and it shows the evolutionary relationships that exists among organisms called taxa based on their physical or genetic similarities and differences. The Phylogenetic tree consists of ingroup and outgroup. The ingroup consists of a group of closely related organisms or taxon while the outgroup represents a more distantly related group of organisms or taxon but as close as possible to the ingroup.
The Lily represents the outgroup in the phylogenetic tree while the Orchid are the ingroup. This is because the Lily is distantly related to the orchid.
I believe the answer is A
Answer:
Having more oil than water can majorly affect the country because - as we already know - oil is very damaging to the environment if mishandled, however, it brings in a pretty hefty profit. Although it brings in money, water is more important. That brings us to the answer to our question: Having more oil than water affects the way that the countries economy functions because the less water you have, the more the people of the country are effected and the more that the countries economy is damaged (this means that people are then being negatively effected and this can cause everything to fall apart).
Does this answer your question? If it doesn't make sense, I can always clarify.
Hope this helps!!
Have a nice day :)
Explanation:
Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
