Why do correlations enable prediction, but not cause-effect explanation? (Ap Psychology)
1 answer:
Answer:
Remember that correlation does not imply causation. Just because two things have a correlate with one another, it does not mean that we can jump to an conclusion.
If we look at the graph below, we can see that the rate of diagnosed autism and sales of organic food have an almost perfect correlation. However, we know for a fact that organic food does not cause autism- it just so happens that they correlate with one another.
That is why correlations cannot show cause and effect. To prove that a correlation does so, further studies and experiments must be done.
You might be interested in
The nation that has the absolute advantage in peanuts is India.
<h3>How to solve for the absolute advantage of these countries</h3>a. The country that has the absolute advantage in the pounds of peanuts is India. They are able to produce 10 million worth of the product.
b. This is in the attachment
c. From the calculated opportunity costs, India has been shown to have the comparative advantage in peanuts so they have to specialize here.
The US on the other hand has to specialize in pecans because they have the comparative advantage in it.
d) The PPC for each country is a diagram
e. ) The terms of trade would be a pound of peanut for a pound of pec an for the countries.
Based on this the US would produce 10 units for pecans. They would use 5 units and exchange the remaining 5 units of pecans for 5 units of peanuts from India.
India is also going to do likewise.
Read more on production possibility curve here:
#SPJ1
