Answer:
4. dissociative identity disorder (DID).
Explanation:
Dissociative identity disorder: In abnormal psychology, the term dissociative identity disorder is also referred with the term DID, and is also called as multiple personality disorder or MPD, is a mental health disorder or illness distinguished as an individual possessing at least two or more than enduring personality states.
The dissociative identity disorder in an individual is often accompanied by memory gaps, also referred to as ordinary forgetfulness. It includes problems with emotion, behavior, identity, perception, sense of self, etc.
In the question above, Hilda's case is a classic example of dissociative identity disorder.
The scenario given above is an example of criterion
validation. The criterion validity is a way of measuring an outcome related to
it or it is a way of having to gain statement about a behavior of an individual
and what would likely be the result base on his or her answers.
Iran's government is considered oligarchic because a small class of people has control over the government. Their legislature is called the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
Answer:
They are both considered unbiased parties.
Explanation: test
Answer:
Jim, who is prejudiced against Jewish people, is likely to attribute a Jewish person’s stereotype-inconsistent actions, such as an act of philanthropy, to <u>seasonal causes</u>. In contrast, Jim is likely to attribute a Jewish person’s stereotype-consistent actions, such as self-interested behavior, to <u>dispositional causes.</u>.\
Explanation:
Dispositional attribution: It is based on a person's personality or characteristics. Internal characcteristics (personality traits) cause people to act the way they do
For example: I wrote a bad essay because I decided not to study
Situational Attribution: It is based on a person's situation or environment. External environment (Teacher, President , Police officer) cause the people to act the way they do
For example: I wrote a bad essay because I didn't get the prompt.
Hence, Jim, who is prejudiced against Jewish people, is likely to attribute a Jewish person’s stereotype-inconsistent actions, such as an act of philanthropy, to <u>seasonal causes</u>. In contrast, Jim is likely to attribute a Jewish person’s stereotype-consistent actions, such as self-interested behavior, to <u>dispositional causes.</u>.\