The narrator gives the reader no clue as to who is saying which thing or who the instigator of the conversation is.
Juror Two is a timid, submissive, and nervous/shy man. He doesn't have strong declarations/convictions and is easily influenced by others. In the beginning, Juror Two votes that the defendant, a nineteen-year-old boy (19), is guilty of the fatal situation of his father being gone fatally. But he can't give any explanations why he feels that type of way or certain way!.
When I looked at him, he seemed familiar to me like I knew who he was.
Secret knowledge of the dragon @@@
