Answer:
Option A is the right answer.
Explanation:
The constitution was implemented in such a manner that no state shall impinge upon the centralized powers of the Union Government.
Founding fathers have prohibited the use of standing army during the time of peace as it would affect the liberty of the nation. Federalists feared that the states would become tyrannical if the standing army is allowed by it. Hence, the founding fathers have mentioned in the constitution that the congress have the powers to raise money and appropriate funds for standing army for not more than two years.
Anti-federalist favored standing army as it would safeguard the security of the citizens. But federalists felt that it would alarm the liberty and freedom of the nation and hence constitution allowed standing army but only during the time of peace it must be disbanded.
The federalists presented that they want the u.s constitution as it is and wants to divide up power between the branches of government so that we are all equal and nobody has too much power.
the anti-federalists presentes that they want to change the constitution by wanting the legislative branch to haved more power and that the bill of rights to be added to the constitution becasue they feared that too much power would make a king or tyrant.
hope this helps and i did not copy anything :)
It increased their population sizes, since farming could feed more people than hunting and gathering (the method used before the Neolithic Era).
The purpose of treaties between the U.S. Government and Indians was to first of all keep peace between the two and give colonists permission to settle Indian land. Hope this helps!
