1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vadim26 [7]
3 years ago
7

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!! Why did the Federalists support having the U. S. Constitution replace the Articles of Confederation f

or how the government should be structured?
History
1 answer:
erastovalidia [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Federalists supported the new U.S Constitution and fought to replace the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation were weak and caused disruption in the newly independent United States.

The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government (because of the fear of the British monarchy), had no national currency, and lots of other issues. This caused chaos in the US. The 13 independent states were basically allies in a "confederation" and not united. Each state had their own currency and the federal government couldn't raise taxes and had no real power.

This lead to a poorly formed United States of America that just got independence.

The Federalists wanted to fix these issues that the Articles of Confederation failed to address, but in order to do that, they supported a <em>strong</em> federal government (even if it was run by the people). Of course, the people who supported the Articles objected to this (because of the fear of tyranny). To compromise, the Federalists wrote a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of citizens and states from the new federal government.

The Federalists did solve the issue of a national currency, federal power, and taxes. Once the US Constitution was set in place, the federal government and the US was doing better than it was back with the Articles.

Fun Fact: When the representatives were meeting to make the US Constitution, they broke the law because the Articles of Confederation forbid this. You could only revise the Articles, not write a completely separate and new document.

Hoped this helped!

You might be interested in
Mga bansang miyembro ng axis power<br><br>​
meriva

Answer:

germany ,italy, japan

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the German Schlieffen plan?
natali 33 [55]
Strength: It was a good plan
Weakness: It was never implemented as intended by the author
3 0
3 years ago
What are the religious laws for Judaism, Christianity, Islam?
strojnjashka [21]
The Abrahamic religions, also referred to collectively as Abrahamism, are a group of Semitic-originated religious communities of faith that claim descent from the practices of the ancient Israelites and the worship of the God of Abraham. The term derives from a figure from the Bible known as Abraham.[1]

Abrahamic religion spread globally through Christianity being adopted by the Roman Empire in the 4th century and Islam by the Islamic Empires from the 7th century. Today the Abrahamic religions are one of the major divisions in comparative religion (along with Indian, Iranian, and East Asian religions).[2] The major Abrahamic religions in chronological order of founding are Judaism in the 7th century BCE,[3] Christianity in the 1st century CE, and Islam in the 7th century CE.

Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are the Abrahamic religions with the greatest numbers of adherents.[4][5][6] Abrahamic religions with fewer adherents include the faiths descended from Yazdânism (the Yezidi, Yarsani and Alevi faiths), Samaritanism,[7] the Druze faith (often classified as a branch of Isma'ili Shia Islam),[8] Bábism,[9][self-published source] the Bahá'í Faith and Rastafari.[10][11]

As of 2005, estimates classified 54% (3.6 billion people) of the world's population as adherents of an Abrahamic religion, about 32% as adherents of other religions, and 16% as adherents of no organized religion. Christianity claims 33% of the world's population, Islam has 21%, Judaism has 0.2%[12][13] and the Bahá'í Faith represents around 0.1%.[14][15]
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement about Charlemagne is not true? A. He was a king of the Franks who helped spread Christianity throughout Europe.
victus00 [196]
The statement about Charlemagne that is not true is D. He refused to acknowledge the authority of the pope interneCine and establish his own church.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the functionalist perspective, nation-states were formed because
raketka [301]
Humans must have external constraints in order to live together
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of case does the Supreme Court hear if it has been heard before in another court?
    5·2 answers
  • Example of geography
    14·2 answers
  • The United States' entry into World War II had which of these effects on domestic politics? (1 point)
    9·1 answer
  • 1. How did the Tariff of 1828 affect the<br> South? What did they call this tarifl?
    10·1 answer
  • What did joseph stalin do to be considered a villain? In your answer, list at least three of his actions and briefly explain the
    8·1 answer
  • pope leo xiii of the roman catholic church issued a document called rerum novarum in 1891 that supported
    13·2 answers
  • Police killings prompt activists to seek 'new civil rights movement'
    9·1 answer
  • Plz helppp make a paragraph about years of crisis and add 7 of these words in the picture
    6·1 answer
  • How did the decision made in the Schenck v. United States change the way that US citizens today understand and follow the Consti
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY!!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!