Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A. The Great Schism or the East-West Schism represented the final separation between the Eastern Christian churches (whose leader was Michael Cerularius, the <u><em>patriarch of Constantinople</em></u>) and the Western one whose leader was Leo IX. There were excommunications that ended in 1965, when Pope <em>Paul VI</em> and <em>Athenagoras I</em> revoked the excommunications decrees.
Answer:
part 1: the 38th parallel
part 2: the united states
Explanation:
i just took the test.
Answer:
The Eastern Orthodox Church was founded in Judea.
Answer:
The bad economy in America could cause conflict between the rich and poor people. This was the reason for the Chalmers to equate independence "with slavery on plain truth".
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Plain truth is the concept proposed by James Chalmer to evaluate the life story of Amish farm, followed by the mysterious story of the dead baby.
- It explains the American revolution during the period of independence.
- James Chalmers was a military agent who has immigrated to America after the independence war.
- According to him, a poor economy in a country would lead to internal conflicts between the minds of people.
- He demanded more wealth from the people, for expanding his army base and soldiers, but he failed to serve for people in America.
