In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
The judicial branch does that
<span>its inability to regulate trade and levy taxes</span>
The correct answer is share an avoidant attachment relationship
An avoidant attachment is formed in babies and children when parents or guardians are largely emotionally unavailable or unresponsive most of the time.
Babies and children have a deep inner need to be close to their caregivers. However, they can quickly learn to stop or suppress their external displays of emotion. If children realize that they will be rejected by their parents or guardians if they express themselves, they will adapt.
When their internal needs for connection and physical closeness are not met, children with elusive attachment stop seeking closeness or expressing emotion.
