1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
15

Read the excerpt from Act II, scene v of Romeo and Juliet. Friar Laurence: These violent delights have violent ends, And in thei

r triumph die, like fire and powder Which, as they kiss consume: the sweetest honey Is loathsome in his own deliciousness And in the taste confounds the appetite: Therefore love moderately; long love doth so; Too swift arrives as tardy as too slow. What effects does the foreshadowing in Friar Laurence’s warning to Romeo have? Check all that apply.
It keeps the audience engaged in the plot by suggesting more potential conflict in the story.
It explains to the reader why Romeo and Juliet will never find the happiness they seek together.
It creates suspense as the reader wonders why Friar Laurence would utter this warning.
It characterizes Friar Laurence as a man who believes he has the ability to predict the future.
It provides a clue that something tragic will happen to the lovers later as the story progresses.
English
2 answers:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
6 0
Your answers are:
1,3, and 5!!!!!!!!!!

Hope this could help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


btw can i have brainliest? It would make my day!
ratelena [41]3 years ago
5 0

Option 1. It keeps the audience engaged in the plot by suggesting more potential conflict in the story. (This is only one I could get theres more but I cant find. If its wrong comment on my profile I will give points bye asking a random question)


You might be interested in
In the following sentence, which word is the abstract noun?
Goryan [66]

Answer:

insisted

Explanation:

an abstract noun states an idea or thought

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! The argument between conservationists and preservationists continues today. Remember that conservationists wa
Luden [163]

Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.

Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.

The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.

The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.

The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.

The intrinsic value of the land and other resources  have to retained  and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.

Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.

 If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.

Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.  

6 0
3 years ago
NO LINKS you will be reported! I need this answer asap please, thank you! Will mark brainliest!
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

The answer is D. World's connotations affect the reader's overall understanding of the writing.

The Links:https://www.answer.com

3 0
3 years ago
The old letter they found in the book is and frail.
SpyIntel [72]
On god?? What else did it say
7 0
3 years ago
What is the topic discussed in "Lifeboat Ethics"?The challenges and difficulties of feeding the world's population B. The proble
arsen [322]

Answer:

A. The challenges and difficulties of feeding the world's population

Explanation:

Lifeboat Ethics is a metaphor for asset distribution proposed by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1974.  

Hardin's metaphor depicts a raft bearing 50 individuals, with space for ten more. The raft is in a sea encompassed by a hundred swimmers. The "morals" of the circumstance originate from the issue of whether swimmers ought to be taken on board the raft.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the writer use text structure to develop the central idea of inequality?
    9·1 answer
  • Anything ,everything,nobody and no one are examples of
    8·1 answer
  • Which line from the poem “Edge” contains an allusion?
    12·1 answer
  • Select all that apply. The forest of Crespo:
    9·2 answers
  • HELP HELP HELP HELP
    14·1 answer
  • You don't look happy<br> to see me.<br> What kind of sentence
    12·1 answer
  • What are some beautiful poetic phrases that Thoreau uses to describe the cabin, the lake, or the weather?
    10·1 answer
  • Why is reading informational text important?
    14·1 answer
  • Who has said “Ain’t biting?” in the book The Things They Carry
    14·1 answer
  • What is the benefit of a review of a written work?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!