Answer-
Everyone disappeared without a trace in 1590, and only left behind 2 clues: "Croatoane" carved into a gatepost, and "Cro" carved into a tree. No one knows what really happened, but their are theories that they were attacked by local native american tribes.
Legal aid provided by a government agency is an example of an in kind benefit. Option B is correct.
Benefits in Kind are government policies to help improve the living standards of underprivileged groups without the use of cash benefits.
Benefits in kind are known as all those benefits which are provided by employers to employees or directors, but which are not included as part of their salary or wages. These benefits generally include company cars, private medical insurance or cheap loans.
Benefits in Kind are government policies to help improve the living standards of underprivileged groups without the use of cash benefits.
Answer: B. Secretary of State
Explanation:
The Office of the Secretary of State heads the Department of State which means that the holder is in charge of U.S. foreign policy. This position was traditionally seen as a stepping stone to the Presidency with Thomas Jefferson being the first Secretary and then becoming the third President.
Of recent however, Secretaries of State have not been very successful winning primaries( with the exception of Hillary Clinton in 2016) as parties seem to gravitate to those who have held democratic office but this position has however, produced 9 nominees for the Presidency since independence.
<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
