I'd say D, because that seems like a good writers strategy. To give information centered around the narrative and theme. Otherwise, A.
Correct answer: mischievous waste, in accusing others or tormenting harmless animals.
Explanations: this is an excerpt from Rousseau’s “The Confessions”, which develops the author’s personal philosophies. Rousseau was one of the most representative philosophers of Illuminism.
Answer:
The answer is: b. a blog entry on your website.
Explanation:
The others are formal forms of writing and as such, a formal writing style must be used.
A letter to your senator requires a formal tone. A resume of course requires formal writing. An article for a science magazine is a form of academic writing therefore formal.
A blog post on the other hand, should infuse personality, be light-hearted and engaging. Using a formal tone bores the audience.
A blog is often visited for information, education, entertainment and a whole bunch of reasons. But it is recommended that when writing even informative posts, they should be written in ways the audience will enjoy. This is why formal writing style is not suitable for a blog entry for your website.
I think it’s the first and the last because it’s 4 standards and those give you two each but I’m not sure
The correct answer would be "D. She washed the shells and dried themm in the sun.". First, we should know what a <em>compound predicate</em> is. A compound predicate is when a subject has 2 or more verbs. In your sentence, you have two verbs, which are <em>washed</em> and <em>dried.</em>
