Answer: Hello There!!
<em>
</em><em>Key Points</em>
<em>The Bill of Right’s provision on the freedom of speech was incorporated against the states in Gitlow v. New York (1925).</em>
<em>Core political speech, expressive speech, and most types of commercial speech are protected under the First Amendment.</em>
<em>Certain types of speech (particularly, speech that can h.arm others) is not protected, such as obscenity, fighting words, true threats, defamation, or invasion of privacy. Speech related to national security or state secrets may also not be protected.
</em><em>Freedom of Speech
</em><em>Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions as well.</em>
<em />
<em>The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.</em>
<em />
<em>Critici-m of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others. Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.
</em>
Explanation: I hope this helps!!
B.lord
Lords own sovereignty over the land
At the beginning America was too weak to fight so it would affect us back then because we were not prepared
Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
