Explanation:
Animal rights means that animals deserve certain kinds of consideration—consideration of what is in their best interests, regardless of whether they are “cute,” useful to humans, or an endangered species and regardless of whether any human cares about them at all.
Human beings must not do those things, even if they do them in a humane way. For example: if animals have a right not to be bred and killed for food then animals must not be bred and killed for food. Accepting the doctrine of animal rights means: No experiments on animals.
Animal welfare is important because there are so many animals around the world suffering from being used for entertainment, food, medicine, fashion, scientific advancement, and as exotic pets. Every animal deserves to have a good life where they enjoy the benefits of the Five Domains.
Those aspects of a person that are regarded as important to a
sense of self-identity and self-enhancement are what Allport called the
proprium.
<span>Gordon Willard Allport (an American psychologist) was one of
the first psychologists who studied about the personality or we can say
personality psychology<span>. Allport says that personality is the dynamic organization
within the individual.</span></span>
The traditional instutions and values is based on people taking care of their ownselves in order to move toward the higher economic strata.
The new circumtances on the other hand, encourage people to help others in distributing their wealth so we as a whole society could move together to the higher economic strata.
Cosmides and Tooby tested participants' ability to solve variations of the Wason problem, including ones containing stories about a particular culture. Their results showed that <u>culture-specific knowledge</u> is not always necessary for conditional reasoning.
<u>Explanation:</u>
These tests conducted by Cosmides and Tooby contained the participant using their abilities and logical reasoning in order to solve various variations of the Wason Problem. While the problems had a cultural addition to them, where they may or may not contain stories about a particular culture.
This led to similar results though which showed Cosmides and Tooby that it was not necessary for the participants to have knowledge of the culture specifically to remember or know the stories. Thus, the more general approach and inductive processes were not culture specific and thus, needed no cultural knowledge as the process were distributed similarly throughout the cultures.
