Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
The answer is D- took pictures of and gathered data from Jupiter
Answer:
A. To irrigate the land and sell crops
Explanation:
To divert rivers and streams is an irrigation system used since the antiquity to irrigate crops and to extend the sowing areas, now the difficulty of water access and the low rainfall in Texas obligate them to use that system to avoid crop losses and to improve the production capacity, in consequence, to earn the most quantity of money per crop with the minimun investment and expenses.
Answer:
Great Britain entered World War I on 4 August 1914 when the king declared war after the expiration of an ultimatum to Germany. The official explanation focused on protecting Belgian neutrality; the main reason, however, was to prevent a French defeat that would have left Germany in control of Western Europe.
hope this helps , have a good day , peace
Explanation:
D.) United Nations, because the league of nations was ineffective and basically caused WWII
have a nice day <3
