1.Mostly, we learned it from animal behaviors.
Animal acted on an instictual basis in handling their situation, which could very much lead to violent confrontation.
Since humans and animals shared many similar characteristics, we could argued that humans could acted the same way when we're handling difficult situation
2. Pro-crime refers to a situation when you're deemed as being guilty simply because you're accused of doing a crime., regardless whether the accusation is true or not.
Yes, i have been accused of pro-crime.
On time, when i was sitting on a bench, a man suddenly accused me of having his wallet simply because he lost it and he previously sit at the exact spot where i Sit.
At that time, suddenly people around us demanding me to return his wallet without listening to my side of the story.
3. I had to admit that i didn't handle it very well. I became really agressive and started to lashing out to that man.
I even grap his shirt collar and almost physically harmed him but other people around us held me down.
4, Yes, very much.
Being accused on the spot like that made my way of thinking became really clouded.
My head suddenly filled with anger because i felt that i was treated really unfairly which make my actions after that became really illogical it's like the false accusation actually influence me to do a crime of agression.
Answer:
Correct answer is Miguel Hidalgo
.
Explanation:
Miguel Hidalgo is the correct answer because he was a Catholic priest, whose both parents were creoles.
Simón Bolívar is not the correct answer because it refers to statement and soldier from Venezuela who fought against Spanish rule.
Louis XVIII
, Louis Napoleon and Louis Philippe are not correct answers as all of the mentioned figures were French kings.
Clemens von Metternich is not correct as he was the prime minister of Habsburg Monarchy.
I cannot refer to the character Pedro, because it it a usual name.
Toussaint L’Ouverture is not correct answer, because he was the leader of Haitian revolution.
In company towns, most services (housing, education, etc.) were provided by the employer for the workers. This meant that the workers depended on the company for the fulfillment of all their basic needs.
If the company disliked the idea of the workers joining a union, as they often did, then they had several means to pressure workers into compliance. They could raise rents or evict them from their homes, for example. This monopoly put workers in a tough situation, and discouraged them from joining unions.
Hello. You forgot to put the image to which the question refers. The image is attached.
Answer and Explanation:
Image A is at rest. We can see this, because the image does not have any elements and no hints that indicate that some type of movement, repositioning, or any other factor that indicates a movement occurs.
Image B, on the other hand, is in motion. This can be perceived by the indication that the objects in the image are "outside", which indicates that these objects are outdoors and can be moved by the wind.
