Answer: Sequential
Explanation:
Sequential order is a design following several groups differently. Professor Watt study follows this order.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
for school- school uniform and p. e. uniform
that's one for you, hope you have a good day!!
Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
