Doc3 is your first answer
Doc4 is your second sheet
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
docx
</span>
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
docx
</span>
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
I think the best answer for this is union organizer C
It’s C
Explanation :
......
Answer:
As the marginal tax rate on those high‐income earners was cut sharply from 60 percent or more (to a maximum of 73 percent) to just 25 percent, taxes paid by that group soared from roughly $300 million to $700 million per year. ... The tax cuts allowed the U.S. economy to grow rapidly during the mid‐ and late‐1920s.
Explanation:
