Answer:
A. Being easily distracted by events unrelated to one's goal can interfere with goal
Explanation:
Self-regulation includes the process to maintain the stability of the emotions and thoughts, controlling them in the long run, and managing to produce positive results during the actions.
Performance is the second phase of self-regulation and it involves the learning processes. One of the key questions to consider during this phase is are there distractions and how can we get rid of them.
<u>Any distractions during the performance phase can lead to more satisfying effects and usage of more time than it is planned and necessary.</u> Distractions will lower the concentration and with it the control of the performance. <u>This will have negative effects.</u> Therefore,<u> any distractions must be terminated while this phase of self-regulation is taking place.</u>
Answer:
Everyone generated either one or three associated words to each to be remembered the word.
Explanation:
Long term memory retrieval process is a process that takes place differently. Many things are there that affect the retrieval process of memory. The memory effects by what you get the information past a long time and what information you are getting in the meantime.
Many other variables are there which affects the process of memory retrieval. There are spacing effects and recency effects that affect the pattern of memory retrieval. But the testing effect increases the memory retrieval.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
What’s the question, I don’t understand that, sorry.
