Because they use the scientific method, that's what our world is based on. Mostly of the things we've all got is because they were created by just a necessity.
Answer:
1. Both Bradstreet and Johnson thought that the American Indians were a threat to the settlers.
Bradstreet believed that American Indians who claimed to be loyal to Britain were actually working against them. Johnson believed that American Indians were more complex and dangerous than most Europeans realized.
2. Bradstreet’s interactions with American Indians were short term and during times of war, while Johnson had many interactions with them over a longer period of time. The Europeans misunderstood the American Indians and the American Indian Hunters were dangerous to the Europeans.
<u>My teacher said I missed #2 in the prompt. I hope this helps. He gave me 70%. Please do not rate me badly.</u>
The leaders of the U.S. justified their attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by using the argument that the bombs would prevent a horrible war that would harm or kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. By arguing to protect the people of the U.S, the American leaders went through with the plan to bomb japan and quickly end the war.
Answer:
causes of the Great Depression in the early 20th century in the USA have been extensively discussed by economists and remain a matter of active debate.[1] They are part of the larger debate about economic crises and recessions. The specific economic events that took place during the Great Depression are well established. There was an initial stock market crash that triggered a "panic sell-off" of assets. This was followed by a deflation in asset and commodity prices, dramatic drops in demand and credit, and disruption of trade, ultimately resulting in widespread unemployment (over 13 million people were unemployed by 1932) and impoverishment. However, economists and historians have not reached a consensus on the causal relationships between various events and government economic policies in causing or ameliorating the Depression.
Explanation:
SANA MAKA TULONG
Answer:
Indeed, the Truman Doctrine sought to help free countries not fall into the clutches of communism through economic financing, which would provide them with the necessary well-being to carry out structural and social reforms without having a direct impact on the quality of life. of its inhabitants that could generate left movements. Thus, within this concept, the Marshall Plan was developed, which sought to rebuild the markets of Western Europe to create strong and resistant market societies against communism from Eastern Europe.
Even so, the nations that received the most money were Great Britain and France, which had been winners in World War II and had not had as many economic implications as the other nations. In this case, the US criterion for granting them financing was to fully reactivate their economies so that these in turn would function as reactivation engines throughout the continent. Thus, America not only directly financed the European nations, but also indirectly created the economic stability necessary for the two powers of the moment to promote trade and investment in the continent.