Answer:
By using hypothesis test at α = 0.01, we cannot conclude that the proportion of high school teachers who were single greater than the proportion of elementary teachers who were single
Step-by-step explanation:
let p1 be the proportion of elementary teachers who were single
let p2 be the proportion of high school teachers who were single
Then, the null and alternative hypotheses are:
: p2=p1
: p2>p1
We need to calculate the test statistic of the sample proportion for elementary teachers who were single.
It can be calculated as follows:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of high school teachers who were single (
) - p is the proportion of elementary teachers who were single (
)
- N is the sample size (180)
Using the numbers, we get
≈ 1.88
Using z-table, corresponding P-Value is ≈0.03
Since 0.03>0.01 we fail to reject the null hypothesis. (The result is not significant at α = 0.01)
Your vertex would be (-1,-5)
and your axis of symmetry is x=-1
Answer:
Tax= $ 7,173.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Her taxable income is $ 43,000 which lies in the tax category $ 31,850 to
$ 77,100.
Tax for $ 31,850 is $ 4,386
Plus 25% of the amount = ( $ 43,000- $ 31,850 )= $ 11,150 over
25 % of $ 11,150= $ 2,787.5
Total Tax= $ 4386 + $ 2787.5= $ 7,173.5
Step-by-step explanation:
yes
Answer: 16.6% percent chance she will pull out a blue or orange marker.
Hope this helps! :)
X: represents how many weeks
N: represents books per week
B: <span>represents </span>books she has at anytime
So the recursive formula would be: 100 - XN = B