Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
Federalism is a mixed or compound mode of government that combines a general government with regional governments in a single political system. Its distinctive feature, first embodied in the Constitution of the United States of 1789, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established.
Explanation:
Your answer would be D or 4th answer
Answer:
a. Aztec history, like all history, has a darker side. Humans aren't perfect.
Explanation:
According to the given excerpt, the author talks about people not expecting a smoothly ironed history because there will always be the good and bad sides of history, some beauty and some ugliness.
The author means that Aztec history, like all history, has a darker side, and humans aren't perfect, when he states that we should not expect a "smoothly
ironed" Aztec history.
Answer:
During Sherman's March to the Sea, the Necktie became a symbol of the intentional destruction by the United States Army. With the railroads all torn up, there was no way for supplies to enter into cities like Savannah, which meant that its people had little to eat with little hope of getting more.
