Answer:
Joseph Stalin (assumption)
Explanation: You cant just say "communist party" there were several communist figures and countries with a communist party such as the Communist party in Germany or Yugoslavian partisans
The weather was due to the missiippii
On January 29, 1850, the 70-year-old Clay presented a compromise. For eight months members of Congress, led by Clay, Daniel Webster, Senator from Massachusetts, and John C. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, debated the compromise. With the help of Stephen Douglas, a young Democrat from Illinois, a series of bills that would make up the compromise were ushered through Congress.
<span>According to the compromise, Texas would relinquish the land in dispute but, in compensation, be given 10 million dollars -- money it would use to pay off its debt to Mexico. Also, the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah would be organized without mention of slavery. (The decision would be made by the territories' inhabitants later, when they applied for statehood.) Regarding Washington, the slave trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia, although slavery would still be permitted. Finally, California would be admitted as a free state. To pacify slave-state politicians, who would have objected to the imbalance created by adding another free state, the Fugitive Slave Act was passed.</span>
The Preamble is the opening statement to the United States Constitution. The preamble explains the reasons why the Framers of the Constitution made our government a republic. By doing this, the founding fathers replaced the Articles of Confederation.
The answer is the Monroe Doctrine. This Doctrine was stated by the fifth President of the United States, James Monroe, on December 2, 1823, and became the foreign policy of the nation for many years.
The doctrine stated that:
●<em> The efforts of European nations to colonize land in North or South America, are considered as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention</em>.
●<em> Any interference by European nations with states of North or South America would also be perceived as acts of aggression and would call for U.S. intervention</em>.
● <em>The United States would not interfere with existing European colonies</em>.
● <em>The United States would not get involved with the internal affairs of European nations</em>.
