1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SashulF [63]
3 years ago
8

A hearing aid is an electronic device that __________ sound waves. A. converts B. minimizes C. blocks D. amplifies

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It D

Explanation:

Lana71 [14]3 years ago
3 0
Answer- D. Amplifies
You might be interested in
Explain in detail, how you solved the following problem: The first two terms of a sequence are 10 and 20. If each term after the
KIM [24]

Answer:

T_{2020} = 15

Explanation:

Given

T_1 = 10

T_2 = 20

Each term after the second term is the average of all of the preceding terms

Required:

Explain how to solve the 2020th term

Solve the 2020th term

Solving the 2020th term of a sequence using conventional method may be a little bit difficult but in questions like this, it's not.

The very first thing to do is to solve for the third term;

The value of the third term is the value of every other term after the second term of the sequence; So, what I'll do is that I'll assign the value of the third term to the 2020th term

<em>This is proved as follows;</em>

From the question, we have that "..... each term after the second term is the average of all of the preceding terms", in other words the MEAN

T_{n} = \frac{\sum T{k}}{n-1} ; where: k = 1 .... n -1

<em>Assume n = 3</em>

T_{3} = \frac{T_1 + T_2}{2}

<em>Multiply both sides by 2</em>

2 * T_{3} = \frac{T_1 + T_2}{2} * 2

2T_{3} = T_1 + T_2

<em>Assume n = 4</em>

T_{4} = \frac{T_1 + T_2 + T_3}{3}

T_{4} = \frac{(T_1 + T_2) + T_3}{3}

Substitute 2T_{3} = T_1 + T_2

T_{4} = \frac{2T_3 + T_3}{3}

T_{4} = \frac{3T_3}{3}

T_{4} = T_3

Assume n = 5

T_{5} = \frac{T_1 + T_2 + T_3 +T_4}{4}

T_{5} = \frac{(T_1 + T_2) + T_3 +(T_4)}{4}

Substitute 2T_{3} = T_1 + T_2 and T_{4} = T_3

T_{5} = \frac{2T_3 + T_3 +T_3}{4}

T_{5} = \frac{4T_3}{4}

T_{5} = \frac{(5-1)T_3}{5-1}

<em>Replace 5 with n</em>

T_{n} = \frac{(n-1)T_3}{n-1}

<em>(n-1) will definitely cancel out (n-1); So, we're left with</em>

T_{n} = T_3

Hence,

T_{2020} = T_3

Calculating T_3

T_{3} = \frac{10 + 20}{2}

T_{3} = \frac{30}{2}

T_{3} = 15

Recall that T_{2020} = T_3

T_{2020} = 15

3 0
3 years ago
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Susan was cleaning up after her party, and she had to dispose of ten items. How many will likely end up in a landfill?
Simora [160]

Answer:

  1. seven...................................................
5 0
3 years ago
After reading the poem "To a Mouse," compare Lennie to the mouse in Burns' poem and George to the poem's speaker
Temka [501]

Mice are shy creatures who try to, at all costs, avoid trouble. Lennie is scared to talk to others because he's scared he'll get himself into trouble. Lennie is oblivious to what's going on around him, it's as if he's in his own little world.
8 0
2 years ago
What theories did charles gardner develop
SCORPION-xisa [38]
There was Gardner's Theory<span> of Multiple Intelligences

here's a link with further info: </span><span>www.springhurst.org/articles/MItheory.htm</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which attitude is most typical of parents in North American cultures?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement is true about musical instruments?
    12·1 answer
  • Dr. Whitlock is conducting an experimental study on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication Which of the following will mo
    9·1 answer
  • How many meters do you cover in a 10 km (10-K) race?
    9·2 answers
  • Obsessive- compulsive disorder is
    9·1 answer
  • Does anyone have the answers to the AP World History: Modern Practice Exam II Assignment: AP Multiple-Choice Practice?
    13·2 answers
  • Please can you help me
    7·1 answer
  • A 120 V lamp dimming circuit is controlled by a rheatat and and protected from excessive current by a 2 amp fuse. What minimum r
    7·1 answer
  • The diameter is 9in find it's circumference in terms of piπ
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What factors brought about the end of communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!