1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Llana [10]
2 years ago
10

How did territorial expansion lead to the fall of the Roman Empire?

History
1 answer:
wariber [46]2 years ago
4 0
The Roman Empire's fall was largely due to the army being spread too thin to defend the growing territory.  The army could not recruit fast enough to secure the huge increases in territory.  Also the relocation of men from their domestic lives within the city to the mobile army bases caused a lack of day to day workers within the city.  The economy suffered as result.
You might be interested in
As the population of the unitied states grew, why do you think more people wanted to move west
marin [14]

Answer:The westward-moving population ultimately could be explained by the quest for cheap land and natural resources, economic opportunities, more amenable living conditions for families and self-improvement.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How did the role of the us armed forces play during the war differ between the european and pacific theaters
ira [324]

In the pacific theatre they were a huge portion of the troops, they mostly did the work. But in the european theatre they could have won without the us.

6 0
3 years ago
By about how much did the US increase in size with the addition of the Louisiana purchase?
bogdanovich [222]
The louisiana purchase doubled the size of the U.S.
8 0
2 years ago
What was the name of the New Deal legislation that provided training and work for the unemployed?
zhannawk [14.2K]
Federal emergency relief act
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is this question for New Mexico History contreversal? Which group has been most successful at building political power since
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

I guess this is Just my opinionated answer but its all I could think of- the reason that the question is controversial is all of the subjects within the question are still to this day considered below the average white man. and each and every one of those subjects have fought to get to the amount of power they have today almost equally, and 10x harder than the average white man. ill explain:

Explanation:

women: woman got the right to vote in 1920- this is the 19th amendment to the U.S constitution- it took 19 amendments for a woman in this country to have a voice. before that- woman could barely breathe in public without being burned at the stake (AHEM: salem witch trials) and women still to this day arent taken seriously- we just got our 1st female vice president Kamala Harris- and the bitter (primarily white men) make it a point to say that women should not be in a position of power- and if they are THEY DEFINITELY SLEPT WITH THEIR BOSS. but let a woman attack a mans ego and he dams all women

Natives: well lets just start with the fact that THE COLONIZERS stole the land that was originally owned by natives- they were kinda there first . and then the FACT that the British turned around and KILLED every native they came in contact with. and then the natives had to deal with IMPERIALISM which was basically forcing the white mans ways on any other race, culture, religeon, or ethnicity- because the white man concidered it uncivilized to be different.

chicanos: mexican american war: mexico used to own California, new Mexico, arizona, and texas but one of the previous presidents sold them to the US to avoid a boarder war. - well guess what that didnt stop very much. because yes 1,000s of immigrants are legally (and illegally) crossing the boarder into a new life- but racism is everywhere and latin American people were even forced to pick grapes at 1 point.

african American: SLAVERY, the civil rights movement, police brutality, these are just some of the things they had to face- and still have to today. and they continue to fight for the rights that others are just born with.

so the progress, the success- in general- id say is about the same- speaking about how hard the history (and present day) was and is for all of these subjects. that in its self is how i believe that the question is controversial

(excuse the long explanation)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answer plz and thank you
    6·1 answer
  • What is the last step in the lawmaking process?
    9·2 answers
  • Why is Douglass happy to hear his master say he would be of no use if he were educated?
    15·1 answer
  • What was it about the United Nations that made it a success when the League of Nations failed so miserably
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Why did Iranians take 53 Americans hostage at the American embassy in Iran?.
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me with four minute speech about health :(( i'll give you brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • 2. What was the purpose of the Irish Republican Army (IRA)?
    7·1 answer
  • What happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989
    11·2 answers
  • Identify how the U.S. economy changed as a result of the stock market crash of 1929
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Soviet Union help the chinese communists
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!