Answer:
Peaceful compromise with Britain or C
Explanation:
I did the assement and hope this helps.
They have made it so that works wide wars like WW1 and WW2 most likely won’t happen again because of possible use of WMD’s (weapons of mass destruction). They created peace in WW2 because otherwise many more Japanese civilians would have died, as well as American soldiers. The Japanese leaders weren’t surrendering, and the conflict needed to end. The world is more dangerous now because of the sheer amount of WMD’s that exist. It would only take 40 nukes to put the entire world into a nuclear winter, and the US alone has over 1000.
The Anti-Federalists had more influence on the Bill of Rights, as they were the ones who wanted it in the first place. The Federalists thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while the Anti-Federalists pushed for it.
The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, and numerous other important matters. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, as they associated having a strong government with British tyranny. They thought that if the government was powerful, they may abuse the citizens. The Federalists on the other hand wanted a stronger government. They believed that having a strong government meant having a strong country, and they thought the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good. When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 occurred, the Articles of Confederation was only meant to be changed. It ended up getting thrown out all together and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists disagreed with this and demanded to have a Bill of Rights, which would protect the citizen's rights. The Federalists thought this wasn't needed, as the states had the powers that the federal government did not. The Anti-Federalists insisted though and believed it was important that they had a proper document protecting their rights.
The Anti-Federalists had more influence while creating the Bill of Rights because they were the ones who pushed for it in the first place. They thought having a document to protect the rights of the citizens was needed, while the Federalists thought it was essentially useless as the states already had all of the powers that the federal government did not hold.
The Incans did not have the wheel, money, or writing, (scholars are still trying to figure that one out. though...) but they did have alcohol/corn beer.
