I believe that the most fitting answer for this question would be prosecuting "trusts," or monopolies, that were in violation of the federal Anti-Trust law. During the Progressive Era, or 1900 to 1917, trust-busting efforts were very prevalent. Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson were especially adamant about trust-busting. Hope this helps.
South America and a little in central.
they were in Brazil and that region
The answer is D_
Hinduism was undergoing agitated and problematic times after the formation of Islam and Muslim religion. Hindus were coercively being converted to Islam. Islam being a monotheistic faith clashed with Hindus due to their following of different and multiple gods.
Furthermore, the Mughal emperors of that era were not respecting Hindus and their beliefs.This brought about a need to save Hinduism from extinction and relentless conversions. Sikh Gurus, with origins in Hindu families, formed a fearsome force of ‘Khalsa Sikhs’ to oppose this tyranny and oppression and help hindus return to their polytheistic religion.
They practiced polytheism. Their god RE controlled the sun which grew their crops.
Answer:
Some Americans disagreed with Imperialism because constantly having the military caused stress and anxiety to the american people and it also felt very strict like the way it was in Britian, hence why we left them for our own freedoms. If you were sitting in school and the U.S. military was walking down the halls, that would cause stress because you would be thinking "oh is there something wrong?" If there were to be a king involved it would just be the same situation that the american people just left, and they wanted something different because that obviously didnt work well.
Explanation:
Imperialism: "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force"
"Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending the rule over peoples and other countries, for extending political and economic access, power and control, through employing hard power especially military force, but also soft power"
"The anti-imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for “consent of the governed.” They did not oppose expansion on commercial, constitutional, religious, or humanitarian grounds; rather, they believed that the annexation and administration of third-world tropical areas would mean the abandonment of American ideals of self-government and isolation—ideals expressed in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, George Washington ‘s Farewell Address, and Abraham Lincoln ‘s Gettysburg Address. The Anti-Imperialist League represented an older generation and was rooted in an earlier era; they were defeated in terms of public opinion, the 1900 election, and the actions of Congress and the president because most younger Progressives who were just coming to power supported imperialism"
- American Imperialism | Boundless US History - Lumen Learning
