Answer:
Number 12 Evander Way,
Nairobi.
12 September 2020.
Dear Andrew, how are you doing? It's been a while we talked and I miss hearing your throaty laughter and your words of wisdom and I kind of need them right now.
The thing is, after secondary school, I'm confused on what next to do. I have two options right now: go to university, or learn a trade. Hear me out first, because at this point I'm fairly certain of what you'll say, but if you hear my points, maybe you would reconsider.
As the first child of the family, there are certain sacrifices I have to make for my other siblings of which education is one of them. You know how money is with us and sending me to the university at this point would be tantamount to s uicide. A trade seems the sensible way out because I have the chance to learn hands-on from a person that is already into the business and in a few years, I would establish my own trade.
I understand the importance of university education, but given the high rate of unemployment, I feel it's too big a gamble for me to undertake right now.
I could do with your advice, big fella.
Yours sincerely,
John Nyra.
Answer:
The police were not fair.
Explanation:
Edward Coolidge was being accused of murdering a 14-year-old girl. He was the last person the girl was seen with and with whom she kept in touch before being found dead, stabbed and with gunshot marks on her body. How Coolidge was the prime suspect in the crime.
The police needed to go to Coolidge's house to search and seize his car and other objects that could be used in the investigation, for that, the police needed a search and seizure warrant. Who signed the search and seizure mandate was the Attorney General of the case and for that reason, the arrival of the police at Coolidge's home was not fair and violates the fourth institutional amendment.
This is because, for a term to be valid, it must be issued by someone who holds an impartial position in the case investigated.
The painting contains both internal and external conflict. External conflict exists between the strong lion and the comparatively weaker antelope. The antelope has no chance to win against the hungry lion. This conflict is similar to the conflict between animals of prey and the hunters Zaroff and Rainsford in “The Most Dangerous Game.” Armed with guns, these hunters enjoy hunting down their relatively defenseless prey. This conflict also exists between Zaroff and the humans he hunts. They stand no chance against him, with his knowledge of hunting and the geography of the island.
In the external conflict between Zaroff and Rainsford, Rainsford can be compared first to the antelope and Zaroff to the powerful lion. Zaroff almost kills Rainsford. However, later, when Rainsford gets back to the chateau to challenge Zaroff, the tables turn. Now Rainsford is more like the lion and Zaroff the antelope.
The panther represents internal conflict. It is hungry and wants the antelope, but it is too scared to approach the prey while the lion is devouring it. The panther seems torn between the need to eat and the need to stay safe from possible physical harm from the lion. In the same way, Rainsford experiences internal conflict. As he is contemplating whether to jump into the sea, he is torn between his need for adventure and his need to stay alive.
The birds of prey are similar to Ivan. They appear to be opportunists who steal a shred of meat from the antelope that the lion has chased down and killed. Ivan is also an opportunist. He satisfies his savage needs by torturing Zaroff’s victims.
